Hip Hop x Basketball -- 9: Renaissance(s)
9:Renaissance(s)
The concept that a
sport or a genre of music, especially one often marginalized as “not music”
like hip hop has often been through its years seems foreign to some. The fact, however, is still that each has had
an almost consistently generational window of change that can be expected to
take place. In basketball, the change
can be usually marked to include a “generation” lasting about the length of the
careers of the most prominent players of that time. Often times, you hear them discussed/named in
terms of the most prominent players/combinations of those particular
times. Examples include the “Celtics
dynasty,” the “NBA vs ABA,” of course the vaunted “Magic vs Bird” era, the
“Jordan era,” and then the shared “Shaq/Kobe era” and “Spurs dynasty”
years. Based upon the best players
playing 11-15 years, those five great periods have bridged the time from
professional basketball’s days of infancy in the late-40s and 50s until the
present.
Similarly, and based
completely on a much shorter time table, hip hop has changed through the
years. Beginning with the days in the
parks, to house parties, then to clubs and strictly party raps, on to messages
and descriptions of the inner city as cautionary tales, then to the ‘gangsta’
raps describing them in an cartoonish glorified light and on to the burgeoning
underground pitted against a booming mainstream; the last thing we can claim
hip hop to be is static.
What may be missed,
though, is just how much the changes that the two have made since they’ve both
been very popular forms of entertainment have been tied to one another. As we previously touched upon, once the two
acknowledged one another they seemed inseparable. Again, the Air Jordan sneakers were one
thing, the wearing of the jerseys another and the constantly-visible-together
nature of participants another still.
What brings, and apparently keeps, them together is the almost familial
bond that was created as each was making their most major shifts in popularity
in the mid-80s. It can be argued that
family is a matter of simple coincidence, but the loyalties and behaviors born
of that convenient connection remains what is truly worth discussion. In cases such as this, they were drawn and
not simply cobbled together. This is
suggestive of a more natural fit than a simple boardroom decision made to say
“hey, we’re going to cross-promote these two things,” and a resultant hamfisted
effort in making it work.
Quite flatly put it is quite simple to sell things to people who have agreed to be sold to, or even better are willing to seek it.
With hip hop and basketball newly (at the time) connected and reared to be sold to children and adults at their last most major renaissances; we could look upon their intermingling as a marriage of sorts and they’ve not come unglued since, and that is in spite of aforementioned attempts to drive a stake between them.
Comments